Usually one thing in common they say is that 52 minutes is too much... how come that I think it's too few? What kind of "albums" do these people listen to? Could a 25-30 minutes album be serious?
It's because after 30 minutes they stop listening to Beady Eye (in fact they never name the best songs, that are at the end of it), so their reviews can't be serious.
Those people don't like this kind of music, so they shouldn't write reviews about this kind of music.
"Chart failure seems inevitable"...oops they're 1st in the world chart.
"I had this one all figured out before I’d even started listening. It's the final nail in the Oasis coffin"...
Absurd reviews, full of prejudices, jealous as fuck. Let me have some for you please: the two negative reviews were by American women (a few ridiculous lines as on the left wing Rolling Stone, always against Oasis), this one was by a "man" in a photo with his boyfriend/husband and their son ... Now I understand...
Another one is by a guy with a Polish name (! ok I'm not saying anything, this time, lol) who starts with a deep thought, that only great journalists can write: "Why do Beady Eye even exist?" ...you can imagine the rest of the "review". He talks about money, they did it only for money (typical nonsense from a Polish nazicommunist), because "they don't have anything to do". Deep deep, I would say wise reviews.
Then again repeating that the Roller is a copy of Instant Karma, wow something new. It could be similar, but I don't see all that similarity they say. I think it's even more similar to the Queen's You're my best friend.
Can those people play guitar? I doubt. They see similar things because they want to see them. Because for them it's easy to say: ah Liam thinks to be John Lennon and copies him, stop. Really, he doesn't want to be him and doesn't even want to copy him. That was something he said around 1995 when he was crazy and wanted to provoke people. Those haters always use old things, to hate more and always.
All this sick sense of time they have, they should keep it to listen more to the album.
When they notice in Beady Eye there are some things that are different from Oasis, they say ah! it's different! it's wrong! So: if Beady Eye do something old, it's wrong. Something new, it's wrong.
I know how it is... these people got offended in the past, because Oasis attacked one or another of their favourite stupid bands, and they're still carrying prejudices and rancour.
It's like Elton John (oh just a case eh, he came to my mind not because of gay reviews ahahaha, I think he's a duck, not dick, duck, you remember him in a concert, dressed as a duck), when he recently said that Oasis are not men, and talked shit about them in America around 1995... hey duck, why talking about that in 2011? retard.
Beady Eye are much stronger than you all, again, we're gonna stand the test of time.